Clorox Benefits From FDA’s Decision on Natural
Yesterday I went on a bit of a diatribe about the FDA’s reluctance to define the word, “natural”.
The FDA dealt a disappointing blow recently to consumers hunting for natural choices for their families. Despite petitions … the FDA declined to issue a regulation that would define use of the word “natural” on food packaging in the near future, stating:
…”we’re not sure how high of an issue it is for consumers”. . .
Well it looks like it just became a bigger issue. Announced today:
- » See also: EWG Gives School Cleaning Supplies Their Report Cards (and it ain’t pretty)
- » Get Eco Child’s Play by RSS or sign up by email.
The first major manufacturer to launch a line of natural cleaners, Clorox will distribute Green Works products at major retailers and will support them with an extensive advertising campaign. …which means we’ll be seeing a lot more of the word, “natural” out there.
But what does it mean?
Currently the FDA has this say about use of the word, “natural” on product packaging.
From its 1993 policy:
That leaves a lot of wiggle room.
Until the FDA chooses to better define use of the term, “natural”, consumers should read ingredient lists and avoid cleaning products that contain volatile organic compounds. A list of some of the top ingredients to avoid can be found at National Geographic’s Green Guide.
And…don’t’ forget to write to the FDA.
We need their input now more than ever.







[...] Clorox (which unfortunately includes Burt’s Bees and now GreenWorks) [...]