<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Toddler and NuVal: Keeping (FOOD) Score</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecochildsplay.com/2008/11/06/your-toddler-and-nuval-keeping-food-score/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecochildsplay.com/2008/11/06/your-toddler-and-nuval-keeping-food-score/</link>
	<description>Green and Natural Parenting for Eco-Friendly Families</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:34:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: TwinToddlersDad</title>
		<link>http://ecochildsplay.com/2008/11/06/your-toddler-and-nuval-keeping-food-score/#comment-6170</link>
		<dc:creator>TwinToddlersDad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 01:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecochildsplay.com/?p=1971#comment-6170</guid>
		<description>This system sounds interesting, but I find it somewhat confusing. Does it mean that we should buy only foods that score a 100? Or anything above 90? What is the right number below which you should not buy the food?

I like the idea of trying to simplify the nutritional information so that consumers can make the right choice. I have written about it on my blog based on some recent trends. However, I think that without standard guidelines from the FDA, and widespread adoption by food manufacturers, we are likely going to see many different systems, which may end up doing more damage than good.

http://www.littlestomaks.com/2008/11/07/kelloggs-nutrition-at-a-glance-is-worth-a-closer-look/

http://www.littlestomaks.com/2008/10/22/traffic-lights-and-food-labeling-is-this-a-joke-not-really%E2%80%A6/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This system sounds interesting, but I find it somewhat confusing. Does it mean that we should buy only foods that score a 100? Or anything above 90? What is the right number below which you should not buy the food?</p>
<p>I like the idea of trying to simplify the nutritional information so that consumers can make the right choice. I have written about it on my blog based on some recent trends. However, I think that without standard guidelines from the FDA, and widespread adoption by food manufacturers, we are likely going to see many different systems, which may end up doing more damage than good.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.littlestomaks.com/2008/11/07/kelloggs-nutrition-at-a-glance-is-worth-a-closer-look/" rel="nofollow">http://www.littlestomaks.com/2008/11/07/kelloggs-nutrition-at-a-glance-is-worth-a-closer-look/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.littlestomaks.com/2008/10/22/traffic-lights-and-food-labeling-is-this-a-joke-not-really%E2%80%A6/" rel="nofollow">http://www.littlestomaks.com/2008/10/22/traffic-lights-and-food-labeling-is-this-a-joke-not-really%E2%80%A6/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

