Comments on: Johnson And Johnson’s "Big Bubblin' Stars" Campaign Promotes Toxic Baby Products?

By: Organic and Green Mom Blog | A First Look at What the New Safe Chemicals Act May Mean for Parents: It Won’t Be an Immediate Panacea at Organic Mania

Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:59:41 +0000

[...] Big Green Purse and one of Glamour Magazine’s 70 Eco Heros, Jess from The Green Phone Booth, MaryAnne at EcoChild’s Play and Not Quite Crunchy Parent, Karen from Best of Mother Earth, Katherine from the Safe Mama, Sommer [...]

By: Organic and Green Mom Blog | The Toxic Tub Report: An Update at Organic Mania

Wed, 27 May 2009 03:11:29 +0000

[...] Thanks to: Jennifer our Smart Mama, Beth of Fake Plastic Fish, Jess from The Green Phone Booth, MaryAnne Conlin (aka @mcmilker) from EcoChild’s Play, Jennifer of The Green Parent, Katherine from the Safe Mama, Anna from Green Talk, Alicia from The [...]

By: Johnson and Johnson- Take Back the Toxic Soap -US Green Parents are Not Happy - Go Green - SustainLane

Sun, 17 May 2009 09:54:34 +0000

[...] and Johnson to promote their bath products. They’ve got bloggers, video, contests, you name it. Maryanne also wrote about this campaign over at Eco-Child’s Play, and it’s odd timing with the Toxic Tub report. I find myself scratching my head. A report comes out [...]

By: MaMa

MaMa — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:44:32 +0000

I think Johnson and Johnson has done a wonderful job in providing safe products. I have raised 5 children and 24 grandchildren and the only products I will ever use is Johnson and Johnson. I stand behind them 100%.

By: Major Chinese Grocer Pulls Johnson & Johnson from Shelves « Child Products

Thu, 09 Apr 2009 01:44:16 +0000

[...] and 1,4-dioxane in “gentle baby products, a major Chinese grocery chain is pulling Johnson & Johnson baby products from their [...]

By: nina

nina — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:40:50 +0000

does anyone know if Johnson&Johnson baby products can be returned for reimbursement???

By: Lynn from Organicmania.com

Lynn from Organicmania.com — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 01:58:42 +0000

Wow! Maryanne, you’ve started quite a debate here.

It’s one thing if J&J has decided not to meet with the EWG – but they should address the larger issue raised here – multiple exposures to multiple carcinogens over many years starting in infancy. J&J is a company with a caring image. Why are they being so silent about this? The “We comply with FDA regs” line they are hiding behind won’t cut it.

By: mona

mona — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 04:53:51 +0000

this is getting ridiculous…maybe we can send all our unused J&J products to the formaldehyde activists & they can soak in it–I hear you can get high off it (maybe this explains their advocacy of hcho)…at mortuary school we were told pregnant women should not embalm dead bodies using formaldehyde (though I know one who did with a gas mask) due to the possibility of birth defects/carcinogenic effects on a developing fetus in utero…so why would anyone want to soak their babies directly in it…please, these chemists can use their skills at brilliant innovation to come up with a safer preservative…contact lense sln manufacturers had to find an alternative to the mercury preservative thimerosal that caused many eye problems (~15yrs ago)…it’s not brain surgery (hopefully)–>make a safe product! supply the demand!

By: Major Chinese Grocer Pulls Johnson & Johnson from Shelves : Eco Child’s Play

Sat, 04 Apr 2009 12:23:48 +0000

[...] and 1,4-dioxane in “gentle baby products, a major Chinese grocery chain is pulling Johnson & Johnson baby products from their [...]

By: David

David — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:29:36 +0000

I see that the formaldehyde reps are making the rounds. Not sure how you guys live with yourselves, but, hey – to each their own.

It’s hard to fathom why anyone would think it’s OK to put the same product on a baby that we fill cadavers with. Weirdness.