• View ecochildsplay’s profile on Facebook
  • View ecochildsplay’s profile on Twitter
  • View ecochildsplay’s profile on Instagram
  • View ecochildsplay’s profile on Pinterest
  • View Jennifer Lance’s profile on LinkedIn
  • View ecochildsplay’s profile on YouTube
  • View ecochildsplay’s profile on Google+

Eco Child's Play

Live a greener, healthier life!

  • Environment
  • Pregnancy
  • Food & Recipes
  • Health News
  • Parenting
  • Green Toys
  • Beauty & Beauty Products
  • Green Home & Cleaning
  • Contact

Nature Words Dropped From Children's Dictionary

“Humans seldom value what they cannot name.”   -Elaine Brooks

To make way for modern tech terms such as BlackBerry, blog, voicemail and broadband, the latest edition of the Oxford Junior Dictionary has opted to drop terms pertaining to nature.  No longer can a child check this dictionary and learn more about the blackberry, dandelion, acorn, heron, otter, magpie, sycamore, or willow.

 

Why were these words deemed expendable? A statement from the Oxford University Press clarifies: 

the 10,000 words and phrases in the junior dictionary were selected using several criteria, including how often words would be used by young children.

I’m sorry, maybe I’m missing something here…but which word does your child use more? Broadband…. or dandelion?

As a  self-proclaimed word nerd, I am outraged.

To learn something’s name is to make it your own, to give it a place in your mental library. There is a world of difference between knowing that birds exist, and knowing their names: chickadee, towhee, titmouse, jay. Heron, magpie.  Knowing the names, learning the distinctions, gives clarity and nuance; life and personality.

You cannot love a thing until you know it, and when you know it you call it by name.  It belongs to you.

While I can understand adding technology words into the dictionary, I cannot understand taking nature words out, devaluing their relative importance.  Studies already show that children can name more Pokemon than wildlife species.  They need more accessibility to nature names, not less. 

The Oxford University Press claims that it has removed these nature words because they are less relevant to today’s plugged-in child. So our role as parents is clear: we need to make these words once again relevant to our children. We need to give children enough time and solitude in nature to experience the sacred quiet that nature affords. We need to travel to see the marvelous diversity and majesty of nature, but also find the commonplace wonders in our backyards- like dandelions. We need to teach our children the names, the distinctions. We can involve them in programs like birdcounts and spider webwatches that authenticate this learning.  We can set up bird feeders and go on hikes.  We can experience, observe, and call all the species by name.

We can make a wish and scatter dandelion seeds.  And maybe then they’ll put dandelion back in the dictionary.

What do you think?  Is it valid in today’s world to favor BlackBerry over blackberry?

Photo Credit: boyghost under Creative Commons

  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Pinterest
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • More
  • WhatsApp
  • Tumblr
  • Reddit
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Subscribe!

« Mother of Octuplets Breastfeeding all 8 Babies
Bacon and Leukemia in Kids »

Comments

  1. Dan at Pan says

    February 2, 2009 at 7:25 am

    I am rendered speechless…. or even incapable of typing by the enormity of how wrong this is.

    A blackberry is a small black fruit that bursts with sweetness on a tongue and no child should be considering it an electronic hand held device instead.

    Reply
  2. Kristin says

    February 2, 2009 at 8:09 am

    I am totally stunned by this. I mean, it makes me not want to use the OED. I will have to invest in a good nature dictionary for my kid – he will use that over a technology dictionary any day.

    Reply
  3. John says

    February 2, 2009 at 10:00 am

    As an editor, I am utterly lost for words and outraged, like Mz. Elton, that such a prestigious university publishing press like Oxford is taking such a illogical and poorly thought-out measures to accommodate everyday technology words that any child will immediately pick up once she or he is placed in front of a computer, which nowadays is at age two. The beauty of the English language is that it borrows words from hundreds of languages and makes them her own, and although I commend Oxford for enhancing their Oxford Junior Dictionary to include new terms of technology, it should MOST DEFINITELY NOT be at the expense of nature terms—especially given the horrendous state of our environment. How can we expect the younger generation to be motivated to atone for our current and past generations’ blatant disregard for planet Earth if they are unaware of its unique species and flora?

    It seems absurd, and I dare say downright lazy, that the editors at Oxford University Press cannot think of a way to accommodate a handful of new technology terms to add to their current word entries, as a simple text/font redesign would be all that would be required, or, better yet, a simple production decision to add another page signature to the book to allow for the new word additions. They should be ashamed of themselves, especially due to the fact that they have historically been the gatekeepers of the English language. I cringe to think of what new hair-brained ideas they will come up with next.

    I applaud Mz. Elton for bringing this to our attention. It’s good to know that there are informed parents out there that take the time to bring these topics to our attention!!! Thank you very, very much!

    -Seriously Outraged

    Reply
  4. Lucy says

    February 2, 2009 at 11:51 am

    I am horrified. Who did they ask? Urban children or rural? And surely removing the words from a dictionary is making it even less likely that children will discover these wonderful words. They should add more words, not remove them.

    English is such an astonishing language, with such a huge vocabulary. It is a shame that by stripping out these words from a dictionary that is easy for children to use, literature of all kinds will become more inaccessible for those children. How will they share in fairy tales and fables, nursery rhymes, playground chants and poetry without knowing these simple things?

    Yes, all children should make daisy chains, blow dandelion clocks and soothe their nettle stings with dock leaves – but the words are important too.

    Reply
  5. Molly says

    February 2, 2009 at 12:41 pm

    Honestly, that is just crazy! Some of those words are used on nearly a daily basis in fall (acorn), spring (dandelion) and even today I had a blackberry (the fruit) smoothie for breakfast…. dictionaries are HUGE to begin with… how much of a difference will 6 other words make?

    Reply
  6. Brettney says

    February 2, 2009 at 1:01 pm

    Sounds like a bunch of child consumerism propaganda.

    Reply
  7. Corey~ living and loving says

    February 2, 2009 at 1:42 pm

    IT REALLY REALLY REALLY makes me sad. 🙁

    Reply
  8. dundeewriter says

    February 2, 2009 at 1:51 pm

    Wow, I had not heard about this until I saw your Tweet. How depressing. This is definitely worse than when they added bootylicious to the dictionary a few years ago.

    You beautifully-written post ties in directly with a book I’m currently reading– Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder. Here’s the author’s web site:

    http://richardlouv.com/

    Reply
  9. Phil says

    February 2, 2009 at 5:37 pm

    I love technology in our lives, but this is an ABSOLUTE disgrace. So sad. I think that most children understand the majority of terms they added in the “technology” realm by the time they can speak, while they’ll grow up without learning about some of the world’s greatest assets. Unbelievable. Don’t suppose there’s a petition to change their minds? They should at least be made aware of their inane decision making.

    Reply
  10. Danielle says

    February 2, 2009 at 9:29 pm

    It pains me to think that children need to know a BlackBerry over a blackberry. To me, it is more telling about the parents’ priorities than the interests of a child. Sad.

    Reply
  11. Amy Jussel says

    February 3, 2009 at 12:34 am

    This is the first I’ve heard of such an atrocity, even though on Shaping Youth we cover ‘media and marketing’s impact on kids!’ egad! I know the ‘urban dictionary’ offers slang, and the “Visual Thesaurus” adds media components, but I’d never believe this swap out would be sanctioned…I MUST look into this…and um, blog it. sigh.

    p.s. This is a piece I wrote called “Media Savvy Kids & Nature Deficit Disorder” along those lines: http://blog.shapingyouth.org/?p=131

    Someone has to tell this story to Richard Louv!! ack!

    Reply
  12. Crimson Wife says

    February 4, 2009 at 3:38 pm

    Many of the other words that were dropped from this particular dictionary were Christian ones. I’ve heard the revamp was an attempt to make the book seem “less biased” towards traditional Anglo culture (the current editor is of South Asian heritage).

    Reply
  13. David - climate change says

    February 25, 2009 at 2:49 pm

    They removed “dandelion” and added “celebrity”. Maybe in the next version Britney Spears and Paris Hilton will be in the dictionary. They might need to remove “sun” and “moon”, however.

    Reply
  14. Grace says

    March 3, 2010 at 9:18 am

    This makes me so sad. What will happen to the beautiful traditions of children? Will the precious memories of stringing clovers into jewelry, picking berries by the lakeside, blowing dandelions’ white fuzz off with one blow, and singing childhood rhymes while jumproping be replaced by horrid technology that threatens your health? Even the Christian words such as abbey, monk, chapel, and nun are being removed. What next? Jesus? Christmas? Love? This leaves me speechless with sadness and horror.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Dictionary Eliminates Nature Words, Replacing Them With Tech Terms | PSFK says:
    February 2, 2009 at 10:28 am

    […] [via Eco Childs Play] […]

    Reply
  2. Barn, backar och björnbär « MiljöBloggAktuellt says:
    February 2, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    […] känns inte som ett helt annat ämne när jag samma dag läser hos Eco Child´s Play att Oxford Junior Dictionary har tagit bort bl a följande ord i den senaste upplagan: björnbär, […]

    Reply
  3. MAGPIE - Arthur Magazine Blog » Hello BlackBerry, Goodbye Blackberry says:
    February 4, 2009 at 9:23 am

    […] whole thing broke in the UK back in early December, and the story just now seems to be infuriating “green” parenting bloggers here in North America (tho we read about it first at Next Nature), who are all posting pictures of […]

    Reply
  4. Samanunga » Blog Archive » Nature Words Dropped From Children’s Dictionary says:
    June 26, 2009 at 4:05 am

    […] Full article @ ecochildsplay.com […]

    Reply
  5. OUR CULTURAL COMMONS « Social-Environmental Sustainability For A Better World says:
    December 23, 2012 at 5:27 pm

    […] Brooks. Eco Child’s Play. http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/02/02/nature-words-dropped-from-childrens-dictionary/ (accessed on May 29, […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recipe Rating




This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search Content

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter


About Eco Child’s Play

Our ethos is to provide news, information, and opinions on natural, green parenting to help your family live a greener, healthier life! Additionally, we offer personal consulting services to help you achieve your green living goals.

Jennifer is a vegetarian, yoga teacher, gardener, hiker, teacher, and mother that has been living off-the-grid for over 20 years.

Contact Eco Child’s Play

Plants Over Plastics! Repurpose Compostable Home Products

Convenient Plastic Container Free Dropps Laundry & Dishwashing Pods

More from the archives!

Leave No Child Inside

Hank D and the Bee: A Green Cartoonist? Nah.

Holiday Craft: How to Make a Paper Snowflake

Toxic Johnson’s Baby Shampoo: No More Tears: As Gentle to Eyes as Pure Formaldehyde

Help Save the Planet: Join the EPA’s Team Energy Star

cbd salve joy organics

CBD Products that Actually Deliver: Joy Organics

wama hemp underwear

The Most Comfortable Underwear is Made of Hemp: WAMA Review

Information

  • About & Contact
  • Archive
  • Blog
  • Consulting Services
  • Disclaimer, Disclosure, & Sponsored Posts
  • Privacy Policy

Folk Art Eco-Friendly Lunch Pack: Organic Cotton and Bamboo From Print*Pattern*Paper

BPA found on paper money

Around the Green Parenting Web: BPA in Money, 2nd Hand Xmas, Bed Sharing, Kegels, Natural Birth

The Preemptive Strike on Breastfeeding

Reduce, Reuse, Recycle Play Activity

Dear President Bush: Thank You For Screwing Over My Kids

Popular Categories

  • Breastfeeding
  • Health News
  • Natural Childbirth
  • Parenting
  • Education
  • Product Review
  • Green Toys

Get our posts via email

Please stay in touch!

You might also like to read…

5 Green Products: Kids Djembe to Laundry Balls

Kids Vegetarian Cooking: Organic Button Cupcakes

Original Link Between MMR and Autism Based on False Data

Military's Green Ammunition: Eco-Friendly War?

11th Circuit Rules on Breastfeeding at Work

Copyright © 2023 · Divine theme by Restored 316

Copyright © 2023 · Divine Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.